Isolation, Characterization and Herbicidal Activity of Pseudomonas fluorescens for Controlling Some Wheat Weeds

Authors

  • Bushra S. A. Al-Maliky Author
  • Roaa R. Hassan Author

Keywords:

Zucchini squash, DAS-ELISA, phylogenetic analyses, wild gourd

Abstract

Pseudomonas spp was isolated from the rhizosphere area of two wild plants Radish Raphanus raphanistrum and barley Hordeum spontaneum naturally grown in a wheat Triticum aestivum field. The inhibitory activity of this bacterium was tested against the germination of weed seeds. Six isolates of Pseudomonas sp. were recovered from symptomatic weed plants exhibiting stunting and yellowing that collected from different locations at Baghdad Province. The isolates of Pseudomonas spp varied in their inhibitory activity against seed germination of wild radish and barley, scoring (8.75-92.5) and (10.00-96.25), respectively. The isolates PR4 and PR6 maximum inhibition rates on wild radish and barley ranged (82.50-92.50) and (90.00-96.25), respectively. Whilst, bacterial filtrates when applied could inhibit the seed germination of the two weeds scoring (6.25-90.00) and (5.00-93.75), respectively. Amongst other isolates, filtrates from PR4 and PR6 scored the highest inhibition rates in the seed germination of wild radish and barley which ranged (85.00-90.00) and (88.75-93.75) respectively. Based on morphology and molecular identification PR6 and PR4 were bacterial isolates of Pseudomonas fluorescens. Nucleotide sequences of the two isolates were deposit in the NBCI GenBank data base under the accession numbers MW740144 and MW740145. Data indicated the application of bacteria and their filtrates enabled an ecofriendly control against weeds.

References

1. Gupta A, Kumar T, Kumar J. A comprehensive review of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): Challenges and strategy. Int J Agric Food Sci. 2025;7: 236–241. doi:10.33545/2664844X.2025.v7.i2d.301

2. Gyawali A, Bhandari R, Budhathoki P, Bhattrai S. A review on effect of weeds in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and their management practices. Food Agri Manage. 2022;2: 48–54. doi:10.26480/faer.02.2022.48.54

3. Hammood WF, Al-Khaldy RAA, Safi SMA, Al-Azawi NM. Impact of some herbicides on growth indicators of some wheat cultivars and weight of companion weeds. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 2023;1158: 062026. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1158/6/062026

4. Saini R, Singh S. Use of natural products for weed management in high-value crops: An Overview. AJAR. 2019;4: 25. doi:10.28933/ajar-2018-11-2808

5. Harding DP, Raizada MN. Controlling weeds with fungi, bacteria and viruses: a review. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6. doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00659

6. Kennedy AC. Pseudomonas fluorescens strains selectively suppress annual bluegrass (Poa annua L.). Biological Control. 2016;103: 210–217. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.09.012

7. Fang W, Liu F, Wu Z, Zhang Z, Wang K. Plant-associated bacteria as sources for the development of bioherbicides. Plants. 2022;11: 3404. doi:10.3390/plants11233404

8. Kennedy AC. Selective soil bacteria to manage downy brome, jointed goat grass, and medusa head and do no harm to other biota. Biological Control. 2018;123: 18–27. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.05.002

9. Raza T, Qadir MF, Imran S, Khatoon Z, Khan MY, Mechri M, et al. Bioherbicides: revolutionizing weed management for sustainable agriculture in the era of One-health. Current Research in Microbial Sciences. 2025;8: 100394. doi:10.1016/j.crmicr.2025.100394

10. McPhail KL, Armstrong DJ, Azevedo MD, Banowetz GM, Mills DI. 4-Formylaminooxyvinylglycine, an herbicidal germination-arrest factor from Pseudomonas rhizosphere bacteria. J Nat Prod. 2010;73: 1853–1857. doi:10.1021/np1004856

11. Halgren A, Maselko M, Azevedo M, Mills D, Armstrong D, Banowetz G. Genetics of germination-arrest factor (GAF) production by Pseudomonas fluorescens WH6: identification of a gene cluster essential for GAF biosynthesis. Micro-biology. 2013;159: 36–45. doi:10.1099/mic.0.062166-0

12. Mupondwa E, Li X, Boyetchko S, Hynes R, Geissler J. Technoeconomic analysis of large-scale production of pre-emergent Pseudomonas fluorescens microbial bioherbicide in Canada. Bioresource Technology. 2015;175: 517–528. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.130

13. Mejri D, Gamalero E, Souissi T. Formulation development of the deleterious rhizobacterium Pseudomonas trivialis X33d for biocontrol of brome (Bromus diandrus) in durum wheat. J Appl Microbiol. 2013;114: 219–228. doi:10.1111/jam.12036

14. Pyke DA, Shaff SE, Gregg MA, Conley JL. Weed-suppressive bacteria applied as a spray or seed mixture did not control Bromus tectorum. Rangeland Ecology & Management. 2020;73: 749–752. doi:10.1016/j.rama.2019.11.001

15. Hasan M, Ahmad-Hamdani MS, Rosli AM, Hamdan H. Bioherbicides: An eco-friendly tool for sustainable weed management. Plants. 2021;10: 1212. doi:10.3390/plants10061212

16. Brinkman MA, Clay SA, Kremer RJ. Influence of deleterious rhizobacteria on leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) Roots. Weed technol. 1999;13: 835–839. doi:10.1017/S0890037X00042317

17. Caldwell CJ, Hynes RK, Boyetchko SM, Korber DR. Colonization and bioherbicidal activity on green foxtail by Pseudomonas fluorescens BRG100 in a pesta formulation. Can J Microbiol. 2012;58: 1–9. doi:10.1139/w11-109

18. Mustafa A, Naveed M, Saeed Q, Nadeem Ashraf M, Hussain A, Abbas T, et al. Application Potentials of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria and Fungi as an Alternative to Conventional Weed Control Methods. In: Hasanuzzaman M, Carvalho Minhoto Teixeira Filho M, Fujita M, Assis Rodrigues Nogueira T, editors. Sustainable Crop Production. IntechOpen; 2020. doi:10.5772/intechopen.86339

19. Revitaningrum A, Lay AJ, Iskandar KR, Razhin MN. Utilization of Pseudomonas fluorescens bacteria in weed control and phosphate supply in oil palm (Elais Guineensis Jacq.) Plantations. Int J Oil Palm. 2024;7. doi:10.35876/ijop.v7i2.121

20. King EO, Ward MK, RANEY DE. Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin. J Lab Clin Med. 1954;44(2):301-307.

21. Schaad NW, American Phytopathological Society, editors. Laboratory guide for identification of plant pathogenic bacteria. St. Paul, Minn: The Society; 1980.

22. Harrigan WF, MacCance ME. Laboratory methods in food and dairy microbiology: Rev. ed. of “Laboratory methods in microbiology”, 1966, prep. by W.F. Harrigan. 5. pr. London: Academic Pr; 1984.

23. Starr MP, Stol PH, Trupers HG, Balows A, Schlege HG. The prokaryotes, Handbook on habitats, isolation and iden-tification of bacteria. Berlin: Spring – Verlag;1981.

24. Holt JG, Krieg NR, Sneath PHA, Stanley JT, Williams ST. Bergy’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. 9th ed. Maryland: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins;1994.

25. Baron E J, Finegold SM. Bailey & Scott’s Diagnostic Microbiology. 8th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1990.

26. Shila SJ, Islam MR, Ahmed NN, Dastogeer KMG, Meah MB. Detection of Pseudomonas syringae pv. Lachrymans asso-ciated with the seeds of cucurbits. ujar. 2013;1: 1–8. doi:10.13189/ujar.2013.010101

27. Garrido-Sanz D, Arrebola E, Martínez-Granero F, García-Méndez S, Muriel C, Blanco-Romero E, Martín M, Rivilla R, Redondo-Nieto M. Classification of Isolates from the Pseudomonas fluorescens Complex into Phylogenomic Groups Based in Group-Specific Markers. Front Microbiol. 2017;8. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.00413

28. Fatima Z, Saleemi MK, Zia MA, Sultan T, Aslam MF, Riaz ur Rehman, Chaudhary MF. Antifungal activity of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria isolates against Rhizoctonia solani in wheat. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2009; 8: 219-225.

29. AL-Sudani SFK, Alash SA. The prevalence of bacterial species isolated from Iraqi soil. ATMPH. 2020;23. doi:10.36295/ASRO.2020.231031

30. Dahiya A, Chahar K, Sindhu SS. The rhizosphere microbiome and biological control of weeds: A review. Span j agric res. 2019;17: e10R01. doi:10.5424/sjar/2019174-15073

31. Harris PA, Stahlman PW. Soil bacteria as selective biological control agents of winter annual grass weeds in winter wheat. Applied Soil Ecology. 1996;3: 275–281. doi:10.1016/0929-1393(95)00087-9

32. Li Y, Sun Z, Zhuang X, Xu L, Chen S, Li M. Research progress on microbial herbicides. Crop Protection. 2003;22: 247–252. doi:10.1016/S0261-2194(02)00189-8

33. Banowetz GM, Azevedo MD, Armstrong DJ, Halgren AB, Mills DI. Germination-Arrest Factor (GAF): Biological properties of a novel, naturally-occurring herbicide produced by selected isolates of rhizosphere bacteria. Biological Control. 2008;46: 380–390. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.04.016

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

Issue

Section

Articles